Home
City Council News
Blog
Links
Contact
Donate

Welcome

This website is maintained as an additional communication conduit for my District 7 constituents and the citizens of Tulsa.

Quotable

 "If we raise taxes we will drive business and industry away from Tulsa." 

-- Councilor John Eagleton, January 26, 2010 


"It is impossible to introduce into society a greater change and a greater evil than this: the conversion of law into an instrument of plunder."

-- Frederic Bastiat, The Law (1850)

John Eagleton, Tulsa District 7 City Councilor
Helprin: Why the Air Force Needs the F-22
Tuesday, 23 February 2010 19:40

In the February 22, 2010, Wall Street Journal, Mark Helprin explains why it's tragic folly for the Obama Administration to shut down production on the F-22 Raptor, "the most capable fighter plane ever produced."

Its stealth, speed, agility, and advanced sensors are such that in a 2006 exercise against F-15s, F-16s, and F-18s, the F-22, its pilots scarcely accustomed to it, scored 241 kills to 2. Famously, before its opponents know it's there, their aircraft are exploding. Former USAF Lt.-Col. Joseph Sussingham, F-16 Experimental Command Pilot, put it best: "To face a flight of F-22s is to face a wall of death."

The average age of Air Force fighter planes has more than doubled from 1960-1990 and is fast increasing. As the number of combat wings was nearly halved, and the U-2 and F-117 were eliminated in its anticipation, the F-22 became the keystone of American air power. With no new fighter on the horizon other than the F-35, it was as well a guarantee against placing every egg in one basket....

...The death of the Raptor is encompassed in the 2009 Posture Statement of the Air Force, with what irony one can imagine, that "The Department of Defense provided guidance . . . to eliminate excessive overmatch in our tactical fighter force." In a triumph of international cooperation, China, which will field its own fifth-generation fighter in 2018 or 2020, is eager to help us eliminate excessive overmatch, as are Russia and even India.... 

We have thrown away our best aircraft, as we have—directly or by attrition—discarded good ships, armor, and fighting echelons. We have closed production lines, dispersed the skilled people who run them, and weakened the defense industrial base to the point that in a national emergency it cannot revive. Even the late Sen. Edward Kennedy, hardly a hawk, called the death of the F-22 "ill-advised and premature."

Given that the administration and Congress throw panicked trillions at programs thought up in the spur of the moment, their parsimony in defence of the United States is unjustifiable, even if our brilliant elites simply refuse to contrast the supposed savings to the costs of future wars that otherwise might be prevented. Though the price may be steep for the times, the price of war undeterred, should it be lost or even should it be won, will perhaps be unbearable.

And because it is a price not only in dollars but in the life of a nation and the blood of its sons and daughters, it is necessary to speak without embarrassment for the defense of the United States and for the rightful preparation to deter war or to win it. 

 
X Marks the Spot
Tuesday, 23 February 2010 19:34

The blog Living on Tulsa Time recently published a series of graphs showing financial indicators over the last few years, with an X marking the spot when Democrats regained control of the U. S. Senate and U. S. House. For example, here's a graph of unemployment since 2002:

United States Unemployment Rate since 2002 

 
An open letter on budget shortfalls
Saturday, 20 February 2010 15:30
Councilor Eagleton received the following open letter to city officials and is publishing it here with the permission of the author, who wishes to remain anonymous.

Because of a lack of time and space I will get directly to the point.  When any of us has a negative cash flow we have two options.  1.  Increase revenue, 2.  Decrease spending.  I am old enough that I remember a sales tax for the City of Tulsa of 4% and we had a functioning city that was very safe to live in, my family did not lock our doors, had a very good public transportation system, and in general life was pretty good.  Why is it that in 2010 we cannot live within our means when we are 8.517%?  A percentage allows you to take advantage of the consumerism of the public and live on the benefits of excess however it makes the government vulnerable to the down turns of consumerism as we are experiencing now.  What we are experiencing is spending based on the credit bubble and now that has burst.  I am totally opposed to increasing the sales tax.  We must get our spending in line with the income reducing our expenses to the core services that a city is supposed to provide.  Police and Fire Protection, Clean and Safe Streets, and functioning infrastructure, (Water, Sewer, Trash Pickup).  When the general public is suffering a decrease in revenue as is the public sector it is not wise to increase taxes.  If some citizens are willing you might make it possible for voluntary contributions to particular departments they would like to support.  I have decided to not take my vision 2025 sales tax refund this year for instance.   I am totally opposed to support or drawing from accounts that are designated for specific uses unless the people agree to do so as there is a public trust that must be maintained. 

 
Mayor Bartlett to meet neighborhood leaders, Feb. 23
Saturday, 20 February 2010 15:24

Mayor  Dewey Bartlett Jr. will hold his first meeting as mayor with neighborhood leaders on Tuesday, February 23, 2010, at 6 p.m. at the Central Center at Centennial Park, 1028 E. 6th St. For directions contact the Central Center at 596-1444.

For more information on the City's Working in Neighborhoods Office visit the WIN website or Working in Neighborhoods at 596-1292.

 
Overview of KPMG cost reduction analysis
Friday, 12 February 2010 22:24

The consulting firm of KPMG has been hired to work with the City of Tulsa to identify opportunities to reduce costs while delivering city services more efficiently. KPMG has presented a five-page overview of the six phases of the process:

Phase 1: Project Planning & Mobilization

Phase 2: Service Inventory & Costing

Phase 3: Scorecard Evaluation

Phase 4: Opportunity Generation

Phase 5: Finalize & Present Deliverables

Phase 6: Managed Competition Assistance  

The document identifies five key benefits to the City of the KPMG review: 

Ø
  • Quantifiable strategic cost savings ideas to incorporate in the next City-wide budget
  • Identification of opportunities to gain efficiency, enhance revenue and reduce cost at the service-level
  • Opportunities to consolidate administrative functions performed across the City
  • Identification of services out of alignment with Mayoral, strategic or budget priorities
  • Knowledge transfer to the City based on an integrated KPMG-City team structure 

 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>

Page 1 of 24

If you are unsure what district you live in, you can use the City of Tulsa's Council District Finder by clicking on the following link:

Tulsa Council District Finder